Legal Opinion

King v. Loeb

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 17, 1956No. 35893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

There being no motion for a new trial filed by the defendant, the only matter to be reviewed by this court is the judgment of the trial judge granting the defendant’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Ground one of the motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict presents the defendant’s contention that the evidence submitted upon the trial of the case failed to show that the defendant was in possession of the property at the time the suit was brought. There was no necessity to introduce evidence of that fact for the reason that the defendant alleged in her answer that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Moultrie v. Schofield's Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Securities Trust Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Smith v. Commercial Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  4. Hodges v. CummingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Wilcox v. Citizens Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shea v. FridleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Miller & Meier & Associates v. DiedrichCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. McDaniel v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Dye v. Turner Concrete, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  5. Graham v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API