Legal Opinion
Mayberry v. Endocrinology-Diabetes Associates
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided May 31, 1996No. 3:95-0038PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 30) and Plaintiffs Response thereto (Docket No. 36). For the reasons more fully stated herein, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED, and this ease is dismissed with prejudice.
This employment discrimination action was filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, et seq. (“Title VII”) and the Tennessee Human Rights Act, Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 4-21-101, et seq. Plain tiff contends that the terms and conditions of her employment with Defendant changed after she…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cunningham v. Tennessee Cancer Specialists, PLLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Payne v. Goodman Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2010
- White v. Northern Michigan Regional HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Union Camp Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1997
- Marshall v. Decatur County General HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.