Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Decatur County General Hospital

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided February 26, 2010No. 1:08-cv-01159PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIM

J. DANIEL BREEN, District Judge.

Before the Court are two dispositive motions: Defendants Jason Scott’s (“Scott”) (Docket Entry (“D.E.”) No. 25) and Decatur County General Hospital’s (“DCGH”) Motions for Summary Judg ment, pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (D.E. No. 27). For the reasons hereinafter stated, the Court GRANTS both Defendants’ Motions as to Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claim and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs remaining…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allan v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API