Legal Opinion
Monster, Inc. v. Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 29, 2013No. Case No. 12-cv-2488-YGRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Denying Motion of Monster, Inc. for Summary Judgment And Granting Motion of Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation For Partial Summary Judgment
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Monster, Inc. (“Monster”) filed its operative amended complaint for declaratory relief September 4, 2012 (“FAC,” Dkt. No. 42) seeking a judicial declaration that the Monster Headphone Mark does not infringe any trademark rights of Defendant Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation (“Dolby”) in its Dolby Headphone Mark. Monster’s FAC alleges entitlement to declaratory relief on the following…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- San Diego Comic Convention, Non-Profit Corp. v. Dan Farr Prods.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- BillFloat Inc. v. Collins Cash Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Blue Bottle Coffee, LLC v. LiaoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Go New York Tours, Inc. v. Aurora Tourism Services, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Neo4j, Inc. v. PureThink, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.