Legal Opinion

Neo4j, Inc. v. PureThink, LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 21, 2020No. 5:18-cv-07182Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NEO4J, INC., et al., 8 Case No. 5:18-cv-07182-EJD Plaintiffs, 9 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 10 PURETHINK, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 60 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Neo4j, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Neo4j 14 USA”) motion for a judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) 15 (the “Motion”). Dkt. No. 60. Plaintiff requests judgment on the pleadings as to the First Cause of 16 Action for Cancellation of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music PublishingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Jose Chavez v. James ZiglarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Fleming v. PickardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Robert Van Buskirk, M.D.L., 1257, in Re Cable News Network v. Cable News Network, Inc., Time Inc., and Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API