Legal Opinion

Farinacci v. Beaver County Industrial Development Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1986No. 45 W.D. Appeal Docket 1985PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

We granted allocatur in this case to review the application of Lamp v. Heyman, 469 Pa. 465, 366 A.2d 882 (1976) to a matter where, on the last day to commence an action for personal injuries, plaintiff filed a praecipe for writ of summons but, through plaintiff’s counsel’s inadvertence, service of the writ could not be effected within 30 days of its issuance.

Plaintiffs in the original action, appellants herein, seek damages in connection with a slip and fall which allegedly occurred on February 2, 1980. In compliance with the two-year limitation on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Weiss v. EquibankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Stein v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Jacob v. New Kensington Y.M.C.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Sayne v. WylieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. McCreesh v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Devine v. HuttSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Moses v. T.N.T. Red Star ExpressSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Englert v. Fazio Mechanical Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Advanced Power Systems, Inc. v. Hi-Tech Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API