Legal Opinion
Matka Corp. v. Automated Material Handling, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 2, 1994No. 13539PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff in this breach of contract action has filed a motion to dismiss the defendant’s appeal as untimely. The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the filing of a motion for articulation extends the appeal period pursuant to Practice Book § 4009. We conclude that it does not and therefore, grant the motion to dismiss.
The facts of this case are not in dispute. In April, 1992, the plaintiff brought an action against the defendant for breach of an alleged contract concerning computer consulting work. An attorney fact finder found for the plaintiff. On March 28,1994, the trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. KirshnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Stamford Apartments Co. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Koper v. KoperConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. HollowayConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Marcus v. DuPerrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sawmill Brook Racing Ass'n v. Boston Realty Advisors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Swanson v. City of GrotonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Brycki v. BryckiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Sergeant v. SergeantConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995