Legal Opinion

DeMarchi v. Electro Bleaching Gas Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1935Published

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

This is a motion by the defendant under section 193, subdivision 2, of the Civil Practice Act, to bring in the Niagara Junction Railway Company as a party defendant upon the ground *144that said railway company is hable to defendant, in whole or in part, for the claim made against it in this action, which was brought against defendant for damages for negligently allowing liquid chlorine to be shipped in a defective tank car and failing to make proper inspection thereof so that gas escaped and injured plaintiff, who was working in the street near the car. Defendant’s claim is that the escape of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fox v. Western New York Motor Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Nichols v. Clark, MacMullen & Riley, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Greenhouse v. Rochester Taxicab Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Greenhouse v. Rochester Taxicab CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Booth v. Carleton Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API