Legal Opinion
Booth v. Carleton Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 1, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
We have here for review four orders entered in two actions, the first of which was brought by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her, and the second by her father to recover for loss of services and medical expenses.
The complaints allege that the infant plaintiff was injured on or about January 11, 1930, while a passenger in an automobile being operated along Fulton street, near Carleton avenue, Brooklyn, *297which automobile overturned as a result of a wheel or wheels thereof being suddenly precipitated or caused to run into a depression, hole or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fox v. Western New York Motor Lines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Dudar v. Milef Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by2 opinions
- Piratensky v. WallachCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- DeMarchi v. Electro Bleaching Gas Co.New York Supreme Court · 1935