Legal Opinion

Boykin v. Boykin

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 12, 1990No. Civ. 7710PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAM, Presiding Judge.

This case concerns an original petition for a writ of mandamus requesting this court to order the Circuit Court of Mobile County to dissolve a prejudgment attachment. Richard A. Boykin (husband) contends that pursuant to Rule 64 of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, the trial court erred in issuing and continuing a prejudgment attachment of certain of his assets.

The parties divorced in 1978. In April 1990, the wife filed a motion for a prejudgment attachment, contending that pursuant to the divorce decree she was entitled to certain money or funds held in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Jones v. Preuit & MauldinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Kress v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Garrett (In Re Garrett)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
  2. D.M.C. Enterprises, Inc. v. HopeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. Norman v. Occupational Safety Ass'n of Alabama Workmen's Compensation FundSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Ex Parte Everest National Ins. Co., 2100711 (ala.civ.app. 9-16-2011)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Gillaspy v. Southern Erectors, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API