Legal Opinion

Reich-Bacot v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1996No. 317-96PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOB DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to confinement for life and a $10,- 000 fine. Tex.Penal Code § 19.04(a)(1). The Court of Appeals found the trial judge erred in failing to instruct the jury on self defense. Reich-Bacot v. State, 914 S.W.2d 666, 668-669 (Tex.App. — Texarkana 1996). The Court of Appeals did not perform a harm analysis but instead summarily reversed and remanded the case to the trial court for a new trial. Id, 914 S.W.2d at 669.

In Hamel v. State, 916 S.W.2d 491, 494 (Tex.Cr.App.1996), we held a harm analysis…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Hamel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Atkinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rainey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  2. McFadden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  3. Reich-Bacot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Reich-Bacot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Land v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API