Reich-Bacot v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOB DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to confinement for life and a $10,- 000 fine. Tex.Penal Code § 19.04(a)(1). The Court of Appeals found the trial judge erred in failing to instruct the jury on self defense. Reich-Bacot v. State, 914 S.W.2d 666, 668-669 (Tex.App. — Texarkana 1996). The Court of Appeals did not perform a harm analysis but instead summarily reversed and remanded the case to the trial court for a new trial. Id, 914 S.W.2d at 669.
In Hamel v. State, 916 S.W.2d 491, 494 (Tex.Cr.App.1996), we held a harm analysis…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Hamel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Atkinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
4Cited by14 opinions
- Rainey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- McFadden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Reich-Bacot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Reich-Bacot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Land v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.