Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Swoap
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 10, 1973No. Civ. 32835PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAY, J. *
Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from judgment of the Alameda County Superior Court denying motion for permanent injunction.
Questions Presented
1. The regulation of the State Department of Social Welfare defining a “family unit budget” under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (hereafter AFDC) program does not violate the Social Security Act.
2. The regulation does not violate equal protection of the laws.
Record
Plaintiffs are young, unmarried women, aged at the time of filing the complaint herein, 16 and 17 years, respectively, each the unwed mother of an infant, and each…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City and County of San Francisco v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- County of San Mateo v. DELL J.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Pro-Family Advocates v. GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Allen v. HettlemanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- County of San Diego v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.