Pro-Family Advocates v. Gomez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J.
In this appeal by the Director of the California Department of Corrections, 1 we must determine whether the trial court erred by issuing a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of an administrative regulation excluding certain prisoners from participation in the overnight family visiting program. We hold that the regulation does not constitute an ex post facto law, nor does it violate equal protection. 2 Thus, the trial court erred and we reverse the preliminary injunction.
I. Facts
In April 1995, appellant James Gomez—acting in his capacity as Director of the State…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lam v. NgoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Monterossa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. MesceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Armijo v. MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.