Meekison v. Groschner

Hattie Groschner, in her assignment of errors in the Court of Appeals, claimed that the trial court erred in failing to find that Phyllis M. Heath was estopped to maintain that her promissory note should not be set off against her legacy and devise, in finding that action on the note is barred by the statute of limitations and in failing to give effect to the provisions of Section 10509-186, General Code.

The Court of Appeals found that there was a conflict in the evidence with reference to conduct of Phyllis M. Heath which, it was claimed, estopped her from denying liability on the note, and…