Legal Opinion

Drake v. Found Treasure Min. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada

Decided November 7, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At Law. Motion to strike out amended complaint. Denied. Demurrer to amended complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWLEY, District Judge.

The plaintiff commenced this action in the state district court against the Found Treasure Mining Com-, pany on the 22d day of July, 1891, to recover the sum of $2,500, alleged to be due and owing from said defendant to plaintiff upon a promissory note for that amount, executed by defendant on or about July 22, 1887, payable on demand. The suit was subsequently remolded to this court, upon the ground of the diverse citizenship of the parties, the defendant being a foreign corporation. By stipulation of counsel, an amended complaint was filed, adding the names of John…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hardin v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Hill v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
  3. Sutro Tunnel Co. v. Segregated Belcher Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Quillen v. ArnoldNevada Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bliler v. BoswellWyoming Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Meekison v. GroschnerOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. West v. TheisIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Wilson v. BushCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  5. Pattridge v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API