Legal Opinion

Duross v. Trainor

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1932No. Docket No. 4550PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

A judgment was issued in this cause whereby the defendant was “enjoined, restrained and prohibited from entering, using or occupying Lot 10, Block 3 of the Oswald Home Tract, a Subdivision of the City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, State of California, otherwise known as and called ‘160 E. 45th Street, of the City of Los Angeles’, until March 16, 2025.” From this judgment the defendant appeals.

The action is based upon a certain writing introduced in evidence, between the plaintiff and others, owners of lots and parcels of land situate in the Oswald Home tract, and other named tracts,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Duke v. . MarkhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Wayt v. PateeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. GarrottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Keese v. BeardsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Bradley v. . WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Foster v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API