Richmond D. Co. v. Atchison Etc. Ry. Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, and from an order denying a new trial. R. H. Latimer, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
The action is for damages arising out of a written contract of date January 31, 1910, between defendant as first party, plaintiff as second party, and East Shore & Suburban Railway Company, third party. This latter company is not made a party to the action.
Defendant is the owner of a tract of land situated in the city of Richmond, Contra Costa County, and was desirous of having “said land filled in as herein (by the contract) provided. ’ ’ The area to be filled is particularly described in the contract; the cubic measurement of said area as stated in the contract was “estimated at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. Le DouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Laidlaw v. MaryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- San Francisco Bridge Co. v. Dumbarton Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Condon v. DonohueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fawcett v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Vaughan v. County of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- State v. GoldenIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
- Konda v. LamkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928