Legal Opinion

Miller & Meier & Associates v. Diedrich

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1985No. 69481PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s grant of defendants’ motion for directed verdict on plaintiff’s claim and judgment entered thereon. It does not appeal from the jury’s verdict and court’s judgment for defendant Diedrich on his counterclaim.

Initially there were three defendants. At the close of plaintiff’s case, they moved for directed verdict on numerous bases and, after extended argument, the court reserved ruling. The motion was renewed at the close of all the evidence. It was then granted as to one of the corporate defendants because it came into existence after all…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Elevator Co. v. West Virginia Board of RegentsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Mayor &C. of Savannah v. PalmerioSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. StubblefieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Pendley v. PendleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  5. Ponce De Leon Condominiums v. DiGirolamoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Brandvain v. Ridgeview Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Diedrich v. Miller & Meier & Associates, Architects & Planners, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. Famiglietti v. Brevard Medical Investors, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Goggin v. GoldmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Lister v. ScriverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API