Legal Opinion

Hunsaker v. Kersh

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1999No. 990298PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Justice:

¶ 1 Plaintiffs brought this interlocutory appeal challenging the district court’s denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs assert that the district court applied an improper standard for determining “irreparable harm.” We agree and reverse and remand for application of the correct standard.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The plaintiffs in this case (collectively, “the Hunsakers”) own land in Washington County,. Utah. Defendants Robert D. and Lucille H. Kersh own property in the same vicinity. There are two ponds on the Kersh-es’ property. Traditionally, the Hunsakers have…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. Shoshone River Power, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. Jensen v. Intermountain Power AgencyUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. System Concepts, Inc. v. DixonUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Horne v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. MacK v. Utah State Department of CommerceUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Utley v. Mill Man Steel, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In re the Discipline of Trujillo, No. 4428Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Planned Parenthood Association v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Zagg, Inc. v. HarmerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API