Legal Opinion

Deminsky v. Arlington Plastics MacHinery

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 29, 2001No. 01-0242PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.

¶ 1. Image Plastics, Inc. and its insurer, Federated Mutual Insurance Company, appeal a $1.7 million judgment entered against them in favor of Todd Deminsky for injuries he sustained while operating a plastic-grinding machine. Image, which purchased the machine from Arlington Plastics Machinery, contends that an indemnity provision in Arlington's favor contained in a sales order for the machine should not be enforced. Image further contends that, even if the indemnity provision is valid, Image cannot be bound to the terms of Arlington's subsequent settlement with Deminsky, upon which the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Michelle T. Ex Rel. Sumpter v. CrozierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. M & I First National Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  4. Bush v. National School Studios, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Paige K. B. v. Steven G. B.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Deminsky v. Arlington Plastics MacHineryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Zielinski v. A.P Green Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  3. Randall v. FeltCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  4. Schouten v. Jakubiak (In re Jakubiak)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018
  5. Kelley v. AhernDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API