Legal Opinion
CH2M Hill, Inc. v. Black & Veatch
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided November 12, 1996No. 95-2619PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWedemeyer, P. J.
Black & Veatch, a Missouri general partnership, ("B&V") appeals from an order denying its motion to dismiss a complaint filed against it by CH2M Hill ("CH2M"). B&V claims that the trial court erred as a matter of law when it ruled that CH2M obtained personal jurisdiction over it pursuant to § 801.11(6), Stats. Because under the calls of the stat*373ute CH2M properly obtained personal jurisdiction over B&V, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts central to a resolution of this appeal are not in dispute. CH2M, the prime design consultant to the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District's effort to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wold v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- J.A.L. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Associated Hospital Service, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
- Tesker v. Town of SaukvilleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- CH2M Hill, Inc. v. Black & VeatchCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996