Legal Opinion
Tesker v. Town of Saukville
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided February 12, 1997No. 96-1316PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
Daniel Gute, Chairperson of the Town Board of Saukville, appeals from a judgment of mandamus directing him to take all of the necessary steps to cause an amendatory ordinance to become effective. Gute challenges the circuit court's conclusion that under the zoning ordinance a unanimous vote of the Town Board was not required to pass an amend ment to a procedural provision of the ordinance. We affirm because both the context of the ordinance and common sense support the determination of the circuit court.
The Town of Saukville has adopted the TOWN OF Saukville, Wis., Zoning Ordinance (1991)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- First National Leasing Corp. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- County of Columbia v. BylewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Courtyard Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. DraperCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001