Legal Opinion
New Jersey Zinc Co. v. Singmaster
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 4, 1934No. 429PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, Singmaster, employed by the appellee from 1900 to April 30,1927, had granted to him, on August 20, 1929, patent No. 1,725,742 for artificial silk filament and the method of making the same. He also had granted to him British patent No. 342,743, application filed August 9,1929, granted February 9, 1931, for an improvement in tne manufacture of artificial silk filament; British patent No. 339,603, applied for August 9, 1929, granted December 9, Í930; United States patent No. 1,875,894, applied for May 8, 1929, granted September 6,1932, for arti: fieial silk…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Masterson v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. CiavattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Jamesbury Corporation v. Worcester Valve Company, Inc. v. E. W. Bliss Company, IntervenerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- De Long Corporation v. LucasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Wine Ry. Appliance Co. v. Baltimore & OR Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Smoley v. New Jersey Zinc Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.