Legal Opinion

Miranda v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided April 29, 1999No. 03-97-00830-CRPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. WOODFIN JONES, Justice.

A jury found appellant Domingo Miranda guilty of the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child 1 and assessed punishment at incarceration for 99 years and a fine of $10,000. Appellant complains on appeal that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during both the guilt-innocence and punishment phases of trial, and that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury as to the reasonable-doubt standard applicable to extraneous-offense evidence in the punishment charge. We will affirm the conviction.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Because…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Aleister Carlton Bull v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  3. Christopher Bunch v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  4. Christopher Bunch v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  5. Christopher Bunch v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API