Mulholland Construction Co. v. Lee Pare & Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERGER, Justice.
This case comes before us on an appeal by the plaintiff, Mulholland Construction Co. (Mulholland), from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court in favor of the defendant, Lee Pare & Associates, Inc. (Pare). We affirm. The facts of the case insofar as pertinent to this appeal are as follows.
Mulholland entered into a contract with the town of Narragansett for construction of the Scarborough Wastewater Treatment Facility Ocean Outfall on March 12, 1984. This construction agreement required Mul-holland to dig a trench a minimum of eight feet below the ocean…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ludwig v. KowalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- Jacinto v. EganSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- PROVIDENCE TEACHERS U., LOC. 958, AFT v. McGovernSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
- Paola v. Commercial Union Assurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
- Payne v. Superior Court for Providence CountySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commercial Union Insurance v. PelchatSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
- E.W. Audet & Sons, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurace Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- Foster-Glocester Regional School Committee v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Eigabri v. LekasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Casco Indemnity Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.