Legal Opinion

Furgason v. Woodbury County

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 20, 1931No. 40905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimm, J.

The following plat shows the location of the various tracts, highways, rivers, channels, etc., involved in this litigation:

The plaintiff for several years prior to 1928 was the owner of a tract of land lying immediately east of the town of Oto in Woodbury County. The property was divided into four separate lots by what is known as the ditch or present channel of Little Sioux River, marked “E W” on the plat, running north and south, and by the old channel of the Little Sioux River, which passes in a southeasterly direction through the whole tract, entering at approximately the northwest corner…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ross v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Borghart v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Schussler v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. McCann v. Clarke CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Moffitt v. BrainardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Liddick v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Nalon v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Prymek v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. Magdefrau v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API