Legal Opinion

Lund v. Utter-McKinley Mortuaries

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 1960No. Civ. No. 24350PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J. pro tem.*

Under date of April 6, 1957, defendant Maytor H. McKinley wrote the plaintiff:

“Dear Theril:
“Following our conversation this morning we have agreed for and on behalf of your services to do the following:
“1—To present you with a $2,500.00 bonus which you have received.
*164“2—To hand you each month as severance pay, $600.00 per month for one year.
“I sincerely hope that you appreciate my generosity and fairness in effecting this settlement with you.
“As always, with particular regards,
“Cordially yours,

(Signed) Maytor

“Maytor H. McKinley.”

The crucial issue of the case centered around…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Dell'Orto v. Dell'OrtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Greenberg v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Young v. LoprestiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spence v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Schiffman v. Atlas Mill Supply Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API