Legal Opinion

Butler v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 2003No. B152609PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOLAND, J.

Summary

Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., is the manufacturer of a helicopter that crashed in Griffith Park on March 23, 1998. The crash was caused by the in-flight failure of the helicopter’s tail rotor yoke. The two survivors and the successors of four others who died in the crash sued Bell Helicopter and others, asserting products liability theories of strict liability, negligence, warranty and fraud. Bell sought summary judgment based on a federal statute of repose, which bars actions against manufacturers of general aviation aircraft if the part that allegedly caused the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Esberg v. Union Oil CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Burroughs v. Precision Airmotive Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Gabel v. Hughes Air Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Hartzell Propeller Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Tillman v. Raytheon Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. People v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Burton v. Twin Commander Aircraft LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. South Side Trust & Savings Bank v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API