Legal Opinion

Nielsen v. Emerson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1932No. Docket No. 8178PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT,

An actionto quiet plaintiff’s alleged title to certain real property described in the complaint as lot 24 in block 131 according to that certain map entitleod Resubdivision of Block 131, as per Keller Berger’s Map of Oakland, Alameda County, California, filed February 27, 1890, in the office of the county recorder of Alameda county.

The action was against M. L. Emerson as trustee under the last will and testament of B. Agnes Nielsen, deceased. Defendant trustee, after denying plaintiff’s ownership, averred that plaintiff was estopped from maintaining the action by reason of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Horton v. GoodenoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Lillis v. Emigrant Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Hogan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. In re Estate of RowlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. EdmundsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. English v. EnglishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Seidell v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Seidell v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API