Legal Opinion · Dissent

Seidell v. Anglo-California Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1942No. Civ. 6696Published

1Dissent

*924ADAMS, P. J.

I dissent. The question is whether a judgment in an unlawful detainer action is res judicata in an action in equity to set aside and cancel a sale under a trust deed and the trustees’ deed executed pursuant to such sale.

Section 1911 of the Code of Civil Procedure of California provides:

“That only is deemed to have been adjudged in a former judgment which appears upon its face to have been so adjudged, or which was actually and necessarily included therein or necessary thereto. ’ ’

A judgment is not res judicata nor an estoppel as to matters which could not properly be litigated in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cheney v. TrauzettelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Henck v. Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Brazil v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. MonsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. In Re Estate of ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API