United States v. Mississippi
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GEE, Circuit Judge:
Today we address two cases consolidated on appeal. In the first, the United States demands interdistrict relief to remedy the allegedly segregative effect of various actions taken by the State of Mississippi and by two school districts. We conclude that the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous and that they provide a sufficient basis for us to review the district court’s decision; thus, we must affirm the district court’s denial of interdistrict relief.
In the second case, the NAACP seeks the attorney fees denied it by the district court. We conclude that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Hidden Oaks Limited, Hidden Oaks Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The City of Austin, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Tk's Video, Inc. v. Denton County, Texas, Tk's Video, Inc. v. Denton County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Dean v. RiserCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Walker v. City of BogalusaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Raskin v. Dallas Indep Sch DistCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.