Legal Opinion
Divall Insured Income Fund Limited Partnership, a Wisconsin Limited Partnership v. Boatmen's First National Bank of Kansas City
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 26, 1996No. 95-1081PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
DiVall Insured Income Fund, L.P. (“DiVall L.P.” or “DiVall”) filed this declaratory judgment action against Boatmen’s First National Bank of Kansas City (“Boatmen’s”) claiming that it was not liable on a promissory note due to lack of consideration. Boatmen’s had acquired the note from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) through a purchase and assumption agreement. The district court granted summary judgment for Boatmen’s determining that the defense was barred by the federal holder in due course doctrine. The district court, however, rejected Boatmen’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Pescatore v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. DeglauCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Pescatore v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Miller v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Adams v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.