Murphy v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Bruce G. Murphy (“Murphy”) appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended complaint against Defendant Jeffrey Beck, as Successor Agent for the Federal Deposit Insurance Company, (“FDIC”). Among other things, the district court held that Murphy’s claims against the FDIC were barred by the federal common law D’Oench, Duhme doctrine first expounded by the Supreme Court in D’Oench, Duhme & Co., Inc. v. FDIC, 315 U.S. 447, 62 S.Ct. 676, 86 L.Ed. 956 (1942). Because acceptance of the D’Oench, Duhme doctrine is well-settled in this Circuit, and…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Oladeinde v. Birmingham, City ofCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Martorella v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Trinity Graphic, USA, Inc. v. Tervis Tumbler Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2018
- In Re Managed Care LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
- Aceto Corp. v. TherapeuticsMD, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.