Legal Opinion

Moki Mac River Expeditions v. Drugg

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2007No. 04-0432Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

221 S.W.3d 569 (2007)

MOKI MAC RIVER EXPEDITIONS, Petitioner,

v.

Charles DRUGG and Betsy Drugg, Individually, and as Representatives of the Estate of Andrew Patrick Drugg, Respondents.

No. 04-0432.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Argued November 17, 2005.

Decided March 2, 2007.

E. Thomas Bishop, Alexander N. Beard and Stephanie Ann Finch, Bishop & Hummert, P.C., Dallas, for Petitioner.

Steven E. Aldous, Michael Braden and Robert Ray Varner Jr., Braden, Vamer & Aldous, P.C., Dallas, for Respondent.

Douglas Alexander, Alexander Dubose Jones & Townsend, LLP, Austin, for Amicus Curiae.

2Opinion of the Court · O'NeillJustice O'Neill, joined by Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice Hecht, Justice Wainwright, Justice Brister, Justice Green, and Justice Willett

A Texas court may assert…

3Cases cited61 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API