Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Consolidated Equipment Sales, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 5, 1983No. 78-2639-L-1; CA A23993PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an action for damages alleged to have resulted from breaches of warranties in the sale of a used bulldozer. At the close of plaintiffs case, the trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of evidence. Plaintiff appeals from the ensuing judgment. We reverse as to the claims for breaches of the express warranties and the implied warranty of merchantability.

In reviewing a ruling on a motion for involuntary non-suit (presently identified as motion for judgment of dismissal, ORCP 54B.(2)), in favor of a defendant, the question on appeal is not what was found to have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brewer v. ErwinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Central Engineering & Equipment CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Koellmer v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1970
  4. Seibel v. Layne & Bowler, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Miller v. Hubbard-Wray Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sierra Diesel Injection Service, Inc. v. Burroughs Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Dickerson v. Mountain View Equipment Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Sierra Diesel Injection Service, Inc. v. Burroughs Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Thorson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Pagliaroni v. Mastic Home Exteriors, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API