Legal Opinion
Koellmer v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 27, 1970No. File No. CV 1-677-13757PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDearington, J.
The plaintiff brought an action to rescind a contract and for damages, claiming a breach of an implied warranty of merchantability arising out of a sale of a new Dodge truck purchased by him from the Norwalk Dodge Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Dodge. The plaintiff joined the Chrysler Motors Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Chrysler, as a party defendant in a second count. The plaintiff claimed that both Dodge, acting as agent for Chrysler, and Chrysler warranted that the truck would be of merchantable quality and reasonably fit for the general purposes for which it was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hamon v. DiglianiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Console v. NickouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Terminal Taxi Co. v. FlynnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Paul Vlases v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Kucza v. StoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v. ShiversTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Salmon Rivers Sportsman Camps, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Tassan v. United Development Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Gable v. SilverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.