Legal Opinion
Robert Van Hook v. Carl S. Anderson, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 18, 2006No. 03-4207PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
This is a habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 after petitioner, Robert Van Hook, was convicted by a three-judge panel of capital murder and aggravated robbery. We reverse the judgment of the district court and remand on the ground that Van Hook’s constitutional rights were infringed when Cincinnati police started an interrogation anew with Van Hook after he had requested legal counsel in clear violation of Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981). The police bungled an otherwise strong case. As a result of this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bobby v. Van HookSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Robert J. Van Hook v. Carl S. Anderson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Van Hook v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Bobby v. Van HookSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Van Hook v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.