Bobby v. Van Hook
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as:
558 U. S. ____
(2009) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DAVID BOBBY, WARDEN v. ROBERT J. VAN HOOK ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 09–144. Decided November 9, 2009 PER CURIAM. The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted habeas relief to Robert Van Hook on the ground that he did not receive effective assistance of counsel during the sentencing phase of his capital trial. Because we think it clear that Van Hook’s attorneys met the constitutional minimum of competence under the correct standard, we…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- James McKinney v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- State v. Wilks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Michael Gallegos v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- State v. Wilks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Jesse Andrews v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.