Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garbutt v. Stoll

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1939No. Docket No. 35, Calendar No. 40,200Published

1DissentPotter, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover compensation for the death of her son, George Garbutt, Jr., upon whom she claims to have been totally dependent. The deputy commissioner of the department of labor and industry found plaintiff was totally dependent upon deceased and entered an award of $18 a week. The award was affirmed by the department. Defendants appeal.

George Garbutt, Jr., suffered an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment June 26, 1936, and died on the same day as a result of the injury. His mother, Mrs. Garbutt, was a widow, her husband having died in October,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morris v. Yough Coal & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Parson v. MurphyNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Milwaukee Basket Co. v. WieckiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Miller v. Riverside Storage & Cartage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Franklin Fluorspar Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API