Legal Opinion
United States v. John F. Long and John S. Mahoney
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 19, 1990No. 998, 999, Dockets 89-1227, 89-1392PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
Appellants John F. Long and John S. Mahoney were Teamsters officials in New York City who allegedly misused their offices for private profits. After a twelve-week jury trial before Judge Edelstein, they were convicted of participating in and conspiring to participate in a racketeering enterprise in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) and (d) (1988), and a variety of other substantive crimes connected with or arising out of the racketeering activity.
Appellants raise numerous issues, including errors in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Anthony IndelicatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jose Figueroa, Angel Lebron, and Ralph AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Stanley Friedman, Michael Lazar, Lester Shafran, and Marvin Kaplan, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Frank Locascio, and John GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Manuel Castillo and Juan FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Peter Vario, Michael Labarbara, Jr., James G. Abbatiello, and Silvestro Spilabotte, Peter VarioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. MiniconeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.