Legal Opinion

Sunset Copper Co. v. Zickrick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1923No. 17653PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover from J. E. Zickrick and W. W. Black the sum of $10,000, which it is alleged that the Sunset Copper Company was entitled to because of claimed concealment and misrepresentation of the purchase price of certain mining property. The fund in dispute, or a *566part of it, was also claimed by certain interveners. After tbe action was instituted, a settlement was made between Black, tbe interveners, and tbe plaintiffs, wbeieby Black paid the sum of $3,500 to tbe Copper Company and $1,500 to tbe interveners. Thereafter, in accordance witb a stipulation, tbe…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stewart v. PrestonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Betcher v. KunzWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hindle v. HolcombWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Randall v. GerrickWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Larson v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Richardson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. All American Bus Lines v. SaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. J. E. Pinkham Lumber Co. v. Woodland State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Rust v. SchlaitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API