Legal Opinion

Kyle v. Massey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 5, 1936No. 26269PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

The defendant Mrs. H. B. Kyle owned a tract of farm land. On November 15, 1933, she executed a written agricultural lease thereof to L. E. Massey. Massey was to have possession on January 1, 1934, and the lease was to expire on January 1, 1935, unless extended for a period of one year under provisions contained in the lease which are unnecessary to discuss, due to the fact that the lease could not be construed as being for a period of time in excess of two years. Massey did not demand possession on January 1, 3934, but on January 18, 1934, assigned the lease to his father, who is the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Liverpool, London & Globe Insurance v. T. M. Richardson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  2. Smith v. Minneapolis Threshing MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harmon v. MetcalfeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Raines v. Independent School District No. 6 of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Raines v. Independent School District No. 6 of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API