Liverpool, London & Globe Insurance v. T. M. Richardson Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Oklahoma Cquntyj before B. F. Burwell, Trial Judge! On rehearing. STATEMENT OE EACTS. This was an action brought by the T. M. Richardson Lumber company against The Liverpool, London and Globe Insurance companjr, to recover upon a fire insurance policy issued on December 7, 1896, for loss occasioned by fire June IS, 1897. In order that the important questions presented in this case may be better understood in the application and discussion of…
Read the full summary
Error from the District Court of Oklahoma Cquntyj before B. F. Burwell, Trial Judge! On rehearing. STATEMENT OE EACTS. This was an action brought by the T. M. Richardson Lumber company against The Liverpool, London and Globe Insurance companjr, to recover upon a fire insurance policy issued on December 7, 1896, for loss occasioned by fire June IS, 1897. In order that the important questions presented in this case may be better understood in the application and discussion of the opinion, we deem it proper to fully define the issues upon which the case was tried. The material aver-ments in the…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Hainer, J.:
Briefly stated the evidence is as follows:
That W. H. Ebey was the local agent of the insurance company at Oklahoma City and N. W. Van Valkenburg was .state agent or adjuster for the state of Kansas and for Oklahoma and Indian Territories; that Ebey solicited the insurance from Richardson, who was the manager of the T. M. Richardson lumber company, the defendant in error; that the insured informed him that no written application would be made, but that he could write the company a policy if he so desired; that Van Valkenburg and Ebey thereupon went to Red Oak,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Thompson v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Insurance Co. v. MowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Van Schoick v. . Niagara Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Rowley v. . the Empire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Prudential Casualty Co. v. KerrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Deming Investment Co. v. Shawnee Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Gish v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Western Nat. Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Brown v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, ConnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.