Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Mulanax

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1913No. 2277PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Questions certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third District, in an appeal from Coleman County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hawkins

The Court of Civil Appeals for the Third Supreme Judicial District has certified for our decision two questions which, with its statement of the case, are as follows:

‘ ‘ In the above entitled cause pending in the Court of Civil Appeals for the Third Supreme Judicial District on motion for rehearing, the questions stated below have arisen, among others, which said court deems it advisable to certify to the Supreme Court for decision. The ease is an action of trespass to try title brought by appellant, Hughes, to recover of appellee, Mulanax, a tract of 160 acres of land to which the plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McMurry v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Cleveland v. ClevelandTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Peet v. Commerce & Ervay Street Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Faulk v. DashiellTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Carlton v. GoeblerTexas Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Martin v. DialTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Dial v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Lockett v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Stephens v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Taylor v. First Nat. Bank of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API