Legal Opinion
Rahim v. Truck Air of the Carolinas, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided August 20, 1996No. COA95-146PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN, Judge.
Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant. We find plaintiff’s arguments unpersuasive.
Pertinent facts and procedural information are as follows: Plaintiff purchased twenty (20) rugs from Persian Oriental Rugs of Lahore, Pakistan, which were shipped 11 March 1990 by KLM Cargo pursuant to waybill no. 07487116993. On 12 April 1990, the rugs arrived in Atlanta, Georgia, were placed with defendant for delivery, were divided into two lots of three bales each and assigned waybill nos. 410641 and 410647.
On 18 April 1990, defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Edward and Nancy Hughes v. United Van Lines, Inc., and 291 Sisser Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Hughes Aircraft Company National Union Fire Insurance Company v. North American Van Lines, Inc., and Does 1-100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Underwriters at Lloyds of London v. North American Van LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southland Amusements & Vending, Inc. v. RourkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Morgan v. AT & T CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Goins v. PuleoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Goins v. PuleoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999