Southland Amusements & Vending, Inc. v. Rourk
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Judge.
J.M. Rourk d/b/a Mike’s Windjammer (“defendant”) appeals the trial court’s judgments denying defendant’s request to withdraw his deemed admissions; finding, as a result of those admissions, that there are no genuine issues of material fact so that summary judgment was proper as a matter of law, and; granting Southland Amusements and Vending, Inc. (“plaintiff”) an attorney’s fee. We hold the trial court judgment as to the deemed admissions and summary judgment are proper; however, we find the trial court’s award of an attorney’s fee to be in excess of the allowable statutory…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stillwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Goins v. PuleoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- RC ASSOCIATES v. Regency Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Town of Chapel Hill v. BurchetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Calhoun v. WHA MEDICAL CLINIC, PLLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Alston v. Federal Express Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Crescent Univ. City Venture, LLC v. Ap Atl., Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2019
- Gr&s Atlantic Beach, LLC v. HullNorth Carolina Business Court · 2011
- Menscer v. Pac. All. Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 2017