Legal Opinion

Southland Amusements & Vending, Inc. v. Rourk

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 2001No. COA00-543PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

J.M. Rourk d/b/a Mike’s Windjammer (“defendant”) appeals the trial court’s judgments denying defendant’s request to withdraw his deemed admissions; finding, as a result of those admissions, that there are no genuine issues of material fact so that summary judgment was proper as a matter of law, and; granting Southland Amusements and Vending, Inc. (“plaintiff”) an attorney’s fee. We hold the trial court judgment as to the deemed admissions and summary judgment are proper; however, we find the trial court’s award of an attorney’s fee to be in excess of the allowable statutory…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stillwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Goins v. PuleoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. RC ASSOCIATES v. Regency Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Town of Chapel Hill v. BurchetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. WHA MEDICAL CLINIC, PLLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Alston v. Federal Express Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Crescent Univ. City Venture, LLC v. Ap Atl., Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2019
  4. Gr&s Atlantic Beach, LLC v. HullNorth Carolina Business Court · 2011
  5. Menscer v. Pac. All. Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API