Legal Opinion

Penn-American Plate Glass Co. v. Harshaw, Fuller & Goodwin Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1910No. 6,582PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Prom Superior Court of Madisou Couuty; Cassius M. Greenlee, Judge. Aetiou by Iiarsbaw, Puller & Goodwin Company against tbe Penn-Ameriean Plate Glass Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, C. J.

Tbe appellee in tbe court below, upon a complaint in two paragraphs, recovered a judgment against appellant for $411.75. Appellant’s demurrers to the first paragraph and tbe amended second paragraph of complaint were overruled, and these rulings are assigned as error.

The first paragraph states “that defendant is indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $381.25 for goods and merchandise sold by plaintiff to defendant, bills of particulars of which are filed with, made a part of this complaint and marked 'Exhibit A’; that said sum is now due and wholly unpaid, and judgment is demanded. ‘Exhibit A’…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Harrison v. FortlageSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Justice v. . LangNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Standley v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Hayden v. . DemetsNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Terre Haute & Logansport Railroad v. SherwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pry v. PryIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Graham v. Henderson Elevator Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. J. M. Carey & Brother v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State Ex Rel. Tittle v. Covington Community Consolidated Schools of FountainIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Sams v. KernIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API