Legal Opinion

Sams v. Kern

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1951No. 18,183PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiltrout, J.

Appellant’s action is for the possession of real estate and damages for its wrongful detention. Appellee filed an answer and also a pleading which is denominated a cross-complaint for damages, based upon an assault and battery alleged to have occurred on a date subsequent to the date of the filing of the complaint.

Appellant filed his demurrer to appellee’s cross-action upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was overruled, and this action is assigned as error.

Trial by jury resulted in a verdict against appellant on his complaint,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Avery v. DoughertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Wainwright v. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Boil v. SimmsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Duffy v. EnglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Howlett v. DiltsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Management, Inc. v. MIF Realty, L.P.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Moore v. BoxmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. McKinney v. THE PURE OIL COMPANYIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API