Legal Opinion

Brierton v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 7, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The first assignment of error is that the court erred in giving at the request of the plaintiff instruction No. 1, which reads as follows:

“The court instructs you that, if you find from all the evidence in this case, the plaintiff met and complied with each and every obligation and condition laid on him by the contract here sued on, by delivering to defendant one Glade dredgeboat or excavator of caterpillar traction, in good, merchantable condition, with the shovel thereon repaired so as to be in good working condition, at the place specified in said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kull v. NobleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Old City Iron Works v. BelmontSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hambrick v. Peoples Mercantile & Implement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  2. Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API