Hambrick v. Peoples Mercantile & Implement Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
This is an action by the ap-pellee to recover $2,875.25 assertedly due under a conditional sales contract by which the appellee sold a used cotton-picking machine to the two appellants. The defendants admit the execution of the contract, hut they ely upon a breach of warranty as a basis for denying lability and for recovering their down payment. The ■rial court, having refused to permit the defendants to prove either an express or an implied warranty, directed a verdict for.the plaintiff.
With respect to the express warranty the court’s rejection of the proffered proof was correct. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Drumar Mining Co. v. Morris Ravine Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Buffalo Pitts Co. v. AlderdiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Liquid Carbonic Co. v. CoclinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- New Birdsall Co. v. KeysMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Moss v. YountCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Green Chev. Co. v. KempSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Equitable Discount Corp. v. TrotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Widmer v. Fort Smith Vehicle & Machinery Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Archer v. BucySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.